Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Your voice issue 3
#31
LOL :roll:

Exactly, KissMe.
Behind every argument is someone's ignorance.
Reply
#32
sorry just woke up, and i guess ill vote a YES if you are gonna make a big deal of it.
Reply
#33
It wont make any difference at all anyway.IF they are a good president they will have it ready to hit the protection button for the very minute there old one runs out... Not hard to figure that out..
I think its a silly vote..

It should be they dont stack and have a 2 hours wait time... Big Grin
[Image: cheekygold.jpg]
I love it when Rickyboy bites me !
Reply
#34
If it doesn't make a difference, why are we bothering to vote? Just delete the thread.
Behind every argument is someone's ignorance.
Reply
#35
i agree with you both there. and again i am sorry im very much not a morning person please forgive me if i have made you angry at all :oops: *hugs*
Reply
#36
wow So much Drama this week. I never saw so many people whine about nothing. If players have such problems with others then stand up and declare. Dont wine about everything in threads and PM's :twisted:
Reply
#37
As i am no longer staff i do not know if this will even be implemented. i will email admin or kissme to see if they will make it happen.
[Image: SOA-banner.gif]
Reply
#38
I will let Admin know he needs to take a decision on this Vote.

I hope it will be closed by Monday. Thank you Smile
Nothing is forever...and everything is forever...

Wise men speak because they have something to say. Fools, because they have to say something.
Reply
#39
I look at this in terms of "Community" vs "Combat" - for those who want to be in a community and do not care as much about leveling up/stats etc... a Clan is one way for them to get together and though its not my style of play - I do recognize it as a VALID style of play.

So to the effect of this change in Protection rules I would merely support no stacking, but no window of "vulnerability" where a more aggressive clan could/would declare war while there is an arbitrary "risk zone" of time.

To me, each rule change should be considered, balanced, and take into account as many different playing styles as possible.

In all of the discussions/messages I have NOT seen one message stating the "peaceful" community position and I want to advocate for that type of player.

Play-balance the Clan protection by fewer crimes (cap the crimes at 10 members, and then 30% cap income on that 10 person crime compared to a fully aggressive clan.) And give +25% Respect for a success, and a negative respect (-10?) if their "peaceful" crime fails. And also, peaceful clans with a failed crime should make $0 - no money at all. Put some real pain financially into the "social networking" aspect of the clan section of the game.

Not trying to make it a real firedrill... but I would like to see all aspects of play made available, without those "peaceful" players jammed into a war that they NEVER wanted to face.

OK - To KissMe... I know this wasn't a "YES" or "NO" answer... but sometimes I just don't fit into an absolute / binary world.
Reply
#40
NEW POOL : Do you think we should have a Limit Cap on banks as fallowing : Credit Bank 2% interest with 5mil limit and Cyber Bank with 4%interest and 30mil limit ? [ PS: THE LIMIT WILL BE ADD IT TO EVERYBODY NO MATTER THE LEVEL ]


Now about this issue...many of you perhaps dont understand it why..well we may end up having a 3th Bank ...an evolution bank..the reason we want to see your opinion on this matter is simple...the more limit it is..the less the "big ones" can go so much up in money ....for you to "little ones" to get them..

Think about it...carefull what you decided to vote..and pls post your opinions here...

PS: this pool will be opend for 48hours...to make sure everyone is voting Wink
Nothing is forever...and everything is forever...

Wise men speak because they have something to say. Fools, because they have to say something.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)